Subject? What subject!

[zerg960]

- Resilking diamond no longer counts towards stats. (placing diamond ore subtracts 1.)
- Subtracted all resilked diamond from everyone's stats.
- Changed mechanics of mob sweep to kill less mobs.
- /lag kills sheep, villagers, and chicken farms now.

[maxmmm1501]

Resilking dosent count, same with fortune I assume?

[zerg960]

placing ore subtracts 1 from your broken count.

[maxmmm1501]

Makes sense... So I could give a bunch of ore to a alt (if I had one) and he would have a negative count?

[silentkill9841]

Much better with this! Makes stats much more accurate!

[Nezark123]

I definitely agree with this, can we get it for everything else as well?

2 questions.

1. What keeps one account from continually placing and getting negative while another account silks the ore, boosting their number?

2. Would there be anyway to factor in fortune for the count?
I.e. I silk the ore, +1, I place it down, -1, then I fortune it and get 2 diamonds from one ore, +2. So my overall count for that ore would be +2.

[silentkill9841]

I definitely agree with this, can we get it for everything else as well?

2 questions.

1. What keeps one account from continually placing and getting negative while another account silks the ore, boosting their number?

2. Would there be anyway to factor in fortune for the count?
I.e. I silk the ore, +1, I place it down, -1, then I fortune it and get 2 diamonds from one ore, +2. So my overall count for that ore would be +2.

Well the stats are mainly for the ore itself, not how many diamonds you would get out of it. If it's just the way it is now, it won't cause any confusion. So, when you check your stats, it will be only referring to the ore broken, which is very accurate. And besides using fortune varies in the diamonds it drops which would make someone who looks at your stats wondering how many diamonds have you really mined?

[Nezark123]

Well and showing the fortune IS how many you end up obtaining from mining, so that's more accurate in itself.

If I fortune 3000 ore, it would show 3000 for my stats.
However, if I get the average of 2.2 diamond per ore, then I get 6600 diamonds out of it. Isn't 6,600 a more accurate representation of the number I've obtained?

[silentkill9841]

But like I said, the stats are to represent ONLY the ORE mined, but I guess if you want accurate stats for the actual diamonds themselves, then your method would work well then Nezark. However stats that are based for the ore themselves would remain more accurate. Instead of using a complex method that ultimately will be a little off.

[Nezark123]

Well exactly, that's the whole question. You either want stats to show the diamond count, or the ore count. I was giving a method if you want the total diamonds, but if you just want ore, right now is perfect.